Current Affairs Right-wing parties willing to introduce some form of progressive taxation
Although on Wednesday the cabinet approved a draft budget for 2012 envisaging a deficit of 105 billion crowns, the right wing parties have not given up pushing for an alternative proposal which would enable a more drastic reduction of the public finance deficit to 95 billion crowns. In order to give the latter proposal, envisaging a unified 19 percent VAT rate, a new lease on life TOP 09 and the Civic Democratic Party have said they are willing to consider the junior party Public Affairs’ demand for progressive taxation – albeit indirectly and for a limited period of time. Radio Prague asked Raiffeisen bank’s chief economist and former finance minister Pavel Mertlík what he thinks is behind the unexpected U-turn.
Miroslav Kalousek, photo: CTK
“I think the key problem is the state of Czech public finances: the
revenue side of the budget has been developing much worse than expected
this year. The projection reckoned with unrealistic economic growth of 2.8
percent and expected consumption to grow by 2.3 percent but in the first
quarter there was a negative development in private consumption and the
projection today is around 2 percent, way below the government’s
expectations. So they are missing money in the state budget and it is
highly probable that the situation will be difficult on the revenue side
next year as well. So as I see it, the willingness to discuss changes in
the structure of taxation is that Mr. Kalousek (finance minister from TOP
09) and his party want to increase the VAT to a unified single rate of 19
percent –from the current 20 and 10 – already next year which would
definitely help the revenue chapter and he is ready to make some small
compensation to the junior coalition party in the form of agreeing to some
temporary increase in the degree of progression of personal income tax.”
If they should agree on a unified 19 percent VAT next year what impact would it have on the economy?
“I am quite skeptical about the outcome. Definitely as regards revenues
this will make a significant contribution to state coffers – adding an
extra 10 billion crowns at least, maybe more- on the other hand, it will
also mean increased public expenditures because the price of foodstuffs and
other basic necessities will be elevated and many people will cross various
thresholds which will make them eligible for various forms of welfare
benefits. So, in consequence, on the expenditures side there will be a
remarkable increase and according to some estimates that we have it can
swallow up roughly half of the extra revenue. So it would not be easy and
it would significantly worsen the situation of many families in the Czech
Republic, who are now not far from the poverty threshold. In the Czech
Republic the number of people living below the poverty line is the lowest
in Europe –something like ten percent of the population - but there is a
large number of people who are very close to the poverty threshold on the
upper side and who would very likely fall through that line and become
eligible for state support. And at the end of the day the tax burden will
fall on the lower income earners anyway.“
And what would a 19 percent VAT and progressive taxation do to the country’s economic growth?
“Definitely it would not support economic growth in 2012. From the longer term perspective the impact would probably be neutral, but for the first year or two it would be quite negative.”
Pavel Mertlík
So you would not advise this alternative – you would prefer the more
moderate VAT hike which was approved on Wednesday –is that correct?
“ That is correct and I think there are generally good opportunities for the government to cut expenditures which are ineffective. The general level of taxation in the Czech Republic is currently something like 33-34 percent of GDP and I am pretty sure that for the time being it is appropriate, it is not necessary to have it higher. The problem is on the expenditures side where things like appropriate public procurement, reduction of corruption and a review of various expenditure programmes can help a lot. The government is simply wasting money in many areas.“






